Newt Gingrich’s opening speech is inspiring for all Americans. We should all join in to find solutions….together!
Newt Gingrich to take the stage (watch it here) at Solutions Day.
Read it all here at Red State.
Newt Gingrich’s opening speech is inspiring for all Americans. We should all join in to find solutions….together!
Newt Gingrich to take the stage (watch it here) at Solutions Day.
Read it all here at Red State.
Why cannot the Liberals get that? Easy because often they are evil and to them they are not so how can they recognize what evil is when it is them.
Then, as now, Evil was dismissed by the left because it simply did not fit their worldview. Oh, by the way, that leading British intellectual mentioned above, Beatrice Webb? The next time you read “Peter Rabbit” to your children, remember that Beatrice Potter Webb saw no problem with the starvation of 7 million people in the name of the common Communist good!
So what does the elimination of Evil as a concept do to the worldview of our liberal friends? Well, in the first place, if there is no Evil, there can be no concept of Good. After all, Good and Evil are simply values placed upon a religion-based society to separate the acceptable from the non-acceptable. Conservative would argue that the laws which any civilized society must live by, are after all, based upon the religious mores we have internalized as a people.
Liberals, on the other hand, would argue that laws are not, in fact, religiously based, but merely those customs that particular society has decided to enforce. Marriage between a man and a woman, the fabric of the family unit, and the most civilizing force in the world, is nothing more, nor less, than a custom – a custom they are eager to change.
The inability of the left to acknowledge and to condemn Evil – their unwillingness to even accept the existence of Evil – is their greatest weakness. It is this Moral Relativism that forms the cornerstone of their belief system that disqualifies them from leadership at a time when the world desperately needs an American President who not only acknowledges the existence of Evil, but is willing to work to defeat it.
Moral Releativism…. is an excellent way to define their (Democrats) belief system. In fact, it’s hard for them to recognize Evil, as they are so often described as being Evil, they have indeed lost their way in making moral judgements between Good and Evil.
For an American President to disgrace the exhulted office the way
B. J.W. J. Clinton did is a perfect example of their distorted definintion of Evil, when actually what he did was Evil.
Red State has more here.
Mass. Gov.Deval Patrick showed his true thinking with is statement on 9/11 about how America failed to understand the Muslim’s that attacked America.
He also showed how misinformed and ill-thinking he is in the reality or the War on Terror.
Mark Steyn takes him to task and reminds us of what it takes to stop terror attacks on America and let me give you a clue….Deval, it is in not a fucking hug.
Read Red States Post and comments then follow the link to Mark Steyn’s NRO article there.
Hillary Clinton’s comment about General Petraeus’s report are an example of double speak and slander.
Wouldn’t be refreshing if the General said abruptly, Excuse me Ma’am, Did I hear you correctly? Are you calling me a liar?
Sure sounds like it….
Clinton said during a hearing of the Senate Armed Services committee on Tuesday that both Petraeus and US ambassador to Baghdad Ryan Crocker had been unfairly saddled with the job of being war spokesmen for Bush.
“The reports that you provided for us, really require the willing suspension of disbelief,” she said, serving up a large helping of statistics to counter claims by the two men that the current troop surge plan was working.
Doesn’t it.
Disgusting! And this person wants to be Commander in Chief someday soon. She can of Bill, but of America …No thank you!!
Laura shows that this ignorant member of these illegal alien support groups don’t even know what the hell they are talking about, Nancy Lyall, the legal coordinator for the group “Mexicanos Sin Fronteras“, went on the Laura Ingraham show and stated that the separation of powers in the Constitution refers to Federal, State and Local governments. Using this logic she says that local and state government cannot enforce immigration laws.
Of course any non-liberal brainwashed educated American knows this is a completely idiotic statement as the separation of powers refers to the Judicial, Legislative and Executive branches of the government
Laura shows why she is the best. Listen to the audio over at Digger Realm here.

Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS)
American Traditionalist is proudly powered by
WordPress | Tiga theme by Shamsul with a bit of Ozh | Composed and Designed by Doc | Installed by Mark |